Progressivism and the new deal

In fact, had it not been for the reign of Progressivism more than two decades earlier, Franklin Roosevelt would simply have been a relatively obscure governor of New York, known more for being a distant cousin of President Theodore Roosevelt. The New Deal did not rise out of a vacuum. Rather, the New Deal--and the subsequent canonization of FDR--came about as the result of the legal, bureaucratic, and intellectual framework that was laid down during the Progressive Era of the early s.

Progressivism and the new deal

November 8, Unit 5 - Progressivism and the New Deal The first half of the twentieth century involved drastic changes in the role of government concerning the cultivation of virtue in its citizens and the economy, as well as in the strength and size of the executive branch and government as a whole.

The Progressive and New Deal programs provided Progressivism and the new deal structure for the reformers to implement these changes.

Smiley – Progressivism and the New Deal | The Philadelphia Society

Formative ambition was still a major part of government in both the Progressive and New Deal periods. It was also evident in the pre-progressive industrial era, when the sole mission of organizations like the Knights of Labor was to create a cooperative community of virtuous citizens.

Progressives attempted to foster a similar community spirit with their playground, sports team, and tenement reform projects, thus transferring the responsibility of character-forming from the local to the national level.

This sense of cooperation is also illustrated by the Darwinian theory of government, where a nation is considered a living thing whose parts all work together for the optimum performance of the organism.

Formative ambition, though it dissipated in the s, was present in the early New Deal period as well as in the Progressive era.

Also, many of the New Deal programs had not only an economic purpose, but also a moral purpose. One example is the Agricultural Adjustment Act, which restored agricultural prices to a pre-war level; at the same time respecting traditional values of free enterprise and individual freedom.

Programs such as the Tennessee Valley Authority sought to create jobs so citizens could be self-sufficient, and thus more self-governing.

Essay Manuals

Yet this industrial interdependence reformers like Lilienthal embraced is far from the small business model of Jacksonianism, or the small farmer ideal of Jeffersonianism. With the later adoption of neutral Keynesian economics, however, the question as to whether something would improve self-government or cultivate virtue became less and less relevant.

This consumerism manifested itself in several different ways.

Progressivism and the new deal

In the progressive era, programs for a more direct democracy supplied the needs of the "consumers of government", while still retaining some of the formative ambition that had been the driving force of earlier programs.

The anti-trust movement had many different driving forces, including outrage at its detrimental effects to the economy and consumers, and also its negative impact on self-government and independence. Thus Progressives slowly replaced their aspirations of formative ambition with consumerist ideals.

This consumerism and government control of the economy would become even more evident in the New Deal period. Inthe Supreme Court used the federal power to regulate interstate commerce to approve many economy-regulation programs, such as minimum-wage, labor-management, and unemployment legislation.

Progressivism and the New Deal

The National Industrial Recovery Act attempted to stimulate production and employment, improve working conditions, and lower prices -- economic reforms that were only able to be implemented because of the crisis of the Great Depression.

Finally, with World War II, Roosevelt was forced to effect deficit spending to stimulate the economy. This exercise of Keynesian economics set the stage for the next half-century, where the voluntarist conception of freedom prevailed and cultivation of virtue was no longer a government issue.

Another effect of the Progressive and New Deal reforms was the extension of the federal government, especially the executive branch. While Wilson condoned decentralization to resist economic concentration and preserve self-government, Theodore Roosevelt embraced the new national interdependence, recommending regulations for trusts and monopolies, not abolishment -- evidence of the shift to positive government.

Both Wilson and Roosevelt extended the role of the presidency by assuming responsibility for shaping public opinion and also as they facilitated cooperation between the three branches of government.

Progressives also brought in neutral administrators or social scientists to take the place of many politicians or direct democracy. Regulations on political parties and elections also displayed this distrust in politicians, with innovations like the direct election of Senators, secret ballots, and campaign reform.

While Progressives brought government more on the local level with their social engineers, the enlargement of the presidency and the general reform atmosphere paved the way for the centralist changes of the New Deal. With the New Deal, centralization and bureaucracy became entrenched firmly in the American government.

Programs such as the NRA gave the federal government responsibility for things that had previously been a part of the state or local sphere of government, like economic regulation and welfare.Get an answer for 'Are populism, progressivism, the New Deal, and the Great Society related as one continued reform or are there sharp differences?These four movements represented important reform.

Day 7: New Deal/Progessive Era Poverty Policies Compare and Contrast 1. Day 7 Question ACaroline Coyle, Geena Romero, and Kate Stock 2. QuestionCompare and . Start studying Progressive Era vs.

Online assistance

New Deal. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. -new deal was like an expansion of progressive era but not a continuation methods of progressive era -political-reform national, state, and city gov, make government more democratic. The New Deal differs from the Progressive Movement in that it was a time of regrouping and getting the people back on its feet, and the Progressive Movement was a time of moving ahead with great ideas an innovations.

The New Deal was a government plan that helped the people. The Progressive Movement helped people also, but it seemed to push the wealthy class further beyond the lower class. The architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright soared, John Dewey explored the library catalog system, and Wilson spoke of a new government.

Wilson also brought the country into WWI.

New Deal Vs. Progressive Movement: Essay Example