Sweatshops conclusion

In the work place, the basic assumption is that each person expects fair compensation for one's efforts and the corresponding recognition for those efforts. At the start of the third millennium, the world is, in some ways, entering a time of economic disarray. Some of the world's troubles probably arise because of the lack of understanding those basic rules of human behavior.

Sweatshops conclusion

Its workers often work long hours for very Sweatshops conclusion pay, regardless of local laws. According to the U. Unfortunately, the use of sweatshops became widespread recently. Some well-known companies have been accused and criticized for using this way of production to keep their spending costs as low as possible.

One of these companies is Nike. In place of it, Nike has contracts with other manufacturing companies and use foreign workers located in such countries as China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Mexico. In place of Sweatshops conclusion, Nike has a contracts with other manufacturing companies located in such countries as China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Mexico.

While company earns millions of dollars some of it workers are forced to work to support their families in poor labour conditions. It should be emphasized, that Nike Company is not the one that owns these factories where its shoes are produced and the company is focused rather on marketing issues, not on producing.

But as a client it dictates the terms to the contractor. Companies used to avoid responsibility for factory conditions, so the anti-sweatshop movement has made this excuse unacceptable and forced the retailers — who are, after all, the ones who make the greatest profit, to take the responsibility for the employees of their manufacturing contractors.

In the next years employees in these countries has achieved the Sweatshops conclusion wage rates and right for form unions. Therefore, these productions were moved to the countries with a very weak situation with human rights in general and labour rights respectively. At first their factories were based in China, Indonesia, and Vietnam, where wage rates are the lowest in the whole world.

The working conditions and low wages rates at the factories caused the critic against the Nike Company. There were different kinds of accusations in s, for example, accusations in child labor and that wages are well below the poverty level and of course the accusations in forced and unpaid overtime.

Besides it, others reported physical abuse from the management, poor conditions at work desks including the poor air quality. For example, in the first years that Nike was in Vietnam, one factory official person was convicted of physically abusing workers, another fled the country during a police investigation of sexual abuse charges and a third official was accused for abusing workers.

The choice for criticism. They began to overview these scandal information expecting that public attention and their pressure would influence the changes. So Nike was chosen as an example and target for pressure, and human right groups expected that other manufacturers will have to accept this criticism and change their production rules.

It was significantly important to choose the corporation that really could afford to implement the improvements. At the same time 1, workers from Vietnam started their campaign in order to achieve a raise of one cent per hour.

I need to draw your attention to the fact that protest campaigns took place despite the fact that the strikes were not allowed in the countries mentioned above. Protect workers who speak honestly about factory conditions. Decent Wages Nike has rejected demands that it ensures that Nike workers are paid a living wage—that is, a full time wage that would provide a small family with an adequate diet and housing and other basic necessities.

Instead, the company has used statistics selectively and in a misleading fashion to give the false impression that wages currently paid to Nike workers are fair and adequate. Meanwhile those workers struggle to survive on wages that are barely enough to cover their individual needs, let alone those of their children.

Reasonable Working Hours Safe and Healthy Workplaces Nike has made important progress in reducing the use of toxic chemicals in sport shoe production. Unfortunately, on the few occasions in recent years that genuinely independent health and safety experts have been allowed access to Nike contract factories, they have found serious hazards including still dangerously high levels of exposure to toxic chemicals, inadequate personal protective equipment, and lack of appropriate guards to protect workers from dangerous machinery.

There is also considerable evidence of workers suffering stress from spending large amounts of time in high pressure and frequently abusive work environments. It was used as obligatory source by all of their contracting factories. That is why this report was perceived as a victory for workers and human rights groups, mostly because independent public investigations were allowed.

But some analysts say that these initiatives on monitoring that were accepted are too new to be able to determine how effective they will be. No one will argue that independent monitoring is important, but workers themselves should be able to have a chance for labour and human rights through their own factories in the first place.

He intended to set up the standards for apparel and shoes industries that other companies should follow. Here are these promises: All factories will meet the U. Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Thailand; Nike will fund university research on responsible business practices.

The exploiting sweatshop workers companies are trying to improve the work conditions.The Existence Of Sweatshops Argument Economics Essay; Tweet. The Existence Of Sweatshops Argument Economics Essay.

Sustainability and Corporate Citizenship. Presented To: Todd Thexton. Presented By: Ajaz Shaikh. Ahmad Yunis. Maria Wang.

Search This Blog

In conclusion, the presence of big corporations and competition for labor actually . Property rights are not a natural feature of the world. That's not to say they're bad, of course. But nor are they so fixed and immutable as we might otherwise assume.

Property is a "social construction", and recognition of this fact can open our eyes to the possibility of various different systems. Introduction (Past two decades) Anti-globalisation and human rights groups such as Global exchange targeting Nike for, Sweatshops. Child labour.

Apr 02,  · Rewrite or add to this conclusion paragraph. BEST JOB WINS! CONCLUSION: Sweatshops do not appear totally evil once one understands their benefits to balance against their disadvantages. So next time you purchase something built in a sweatshop, you should remember you are both funding an evil operation but Status: Open.

The Sweatshop Dilemma [Part 1] Sweatshops: good or bad? The dialogue. go directly to: Exploitation | what can we do? | Conclusion. A sweatshop is a place where a worker usually works very long hours and gets paid a very minimal wage, often simply a survival income, if even. Work in these places is often under hazardous conditions or .

Sweatshops essays Sweatshops are manufacturing establishments in which employees work long hours under substandard conditions for low wages. Sweatshops are an important part of people's lives who work in the third world countries. Disregarding the conditions and age requirements that we find ac.

Sweatshops conclusion
Tom DeLay - Wikipedia